Malema lives an opulence life. He goes around labeling EFF as a socialist party but not so long ago he took off his fake socialist cap and placed it with a capitalist cap and told people to buy EFF's R50k concert tickets. To him SA must be a socialist country except for EFF.

It was Jacob Zuma's government that decided to amend the Constitution and making the Constitutional Court the highest Court in the land for all matters. I'm now surprise that MKminions believe the Electorate Court is superior than the Constitutional Court. 🤣🤣

Section 167 of the Constitution allows a person, 'when it is in the interests of justice and with leave of the Constitutional Court', to bring a matter directly to the Constitutional Court; or to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from any other court.

Any matter that deals with a Constitutional issue, the Con Court has the powers to adjudicate the matter if it is in the interest of Justice. The Con Court has jurisdiction to hear the case since it not only public interest but it deals with a Constitutional matter.

This section deals with the code which all parties sign and once the Electorate Court has made a ruling, it cannot be reviewed and appealed. This section doesn't apply in the case of IEC V MK because the issue is about Section 47 of the Constitution.

Jacob Zuma is known for appealing judgments ruled against him. Why people don't want the IEC to exercise it Constitutional mandate as an institution to seek clarity from the highest Court in the land?

People are saying the IEC must let it rest. A criminal who was convicted by the Court and remitted by the President and now wants to join SAPS, they will use the IEC case as a reference.

People are looking at this Judgement in the lense of Jacob Zuma instead of a precedent it setting. This judgement has far wide implications. The judgement is basically saying, a child rapist who was remitted by the President can go to Parliament. IEC must appeal that thing.

Not so long ago, you peddled a lie that Tyla was an industry plant. Now you giving her praise? Hypocrite.

When Pirates score a goal it ruled offside. When Pirates player if fouled in the penalty box ref say it not. When Sundowns get fouled outside the penalty box, it a penalty. This is SA football. #DSTVPREM

The Electoral Court got it all wrong. They are basically saying, if the President reduces the sentence of a rapist to 5 months, the rapist can go to Parliament because he was remitted. The IEC has to approach the Constitutional Court.

This judgement has serious ramification. It essentially saying the President has the powers to reduce a sentence of a Court of law. The issue was not about the President remission but whether or not Jacob Zuma meets the requirements in terms of section 47 of the Constitution.

Kanti who's fooling who la?

So it really shows who really benefited from his administration.

Bill of Rights has a limitations clause. Section 47 isn't included in Section 36 of the Constitution.

Dali Mpofu doesn't understand what he is saying. A remission doesn't change sentence imposed by the Court.

Advocate Ngcukaitobi schooled those judges. 😎

Adv Ngcukaitobi argument is simple. A conviction doesn't change through the powers of the executive. Jacob Zuma was convicted by the Constitutional Court for a contempt of Court and wasn't offered a fine sentence.

She was terrible.

Section 64 of the Electronic Communications Act makes it clear that a foreign company cannot exercise control over a local media company. Whether directly or indirectly. They are allowed a maximum 20% ownership of the media company.