Since 2020, the CPSO has been persecuting Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD for tweeting that
--lockdowns don't work
--waiting for a vax to lift lockdowns is harmful,
--contact tracing covid was futile.

All true statements.

Today, Dr. Gill got her day in court. A thread.
1/5

The CPSO argued:
1. The CPSO can -- in effect -- ignore the free speech rights of doctors because of the precautionary principle.
2. Doctors who contradict public health should be subject to discipline.
3. It doesn't matter if the doctor writes factually accurate things.
2/5

Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD's lawyer pointed out that
1. Dr. Gill's tweets were not factually incorrect.
2. Even if that were not the case, she still has free speech rights.
3. That independent doctors serve as a necessary check on public health overreach.
3/5

Ultimately, the CPSO's actions put Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD through legal hell, damaged her reputation with falsehoods & chilled the speech of countless other doctors who were watching the events as they unfolded.
4/5

The most important consequence is that the CPSO's abuse of power abetted the gov't lockdowns that harmed Canadian children, the working class, and vulnerable populations.

Lockdowns kill, censorship kills, as Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD has often written.
5/5

Addendum: The entire live tweet thread by @JRwatch_ON is worth reading in full. Great job!
x.com/jrwatch_on/sta…

Jay Bhattacharya CPSO Kulvinder Kaur MD The fact that Public Health Bureaucracies are still trying to punish doctors in 2024 for tweets they made in 2020 that were correct in criticizing faulty Public Health protocols & narratives; shows it is all about authoritarian control, not public health.

💯🎯. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⬇️

Jay Bhattacharya CPSO Kulvinder Kaur MD It’s incredible to hear people still say lockdowns worked in China and were a legitimate model. Lockdowns in China were draconian and killed people, and China ultimately gave up its lockdown philosophy and “let ‘er rip”, resulting in a large wave of untold deaths.

@JRwatch_ON So on the one hand they are saying they support debate and free speech. At the same time on the other hand they say you cannot debate or have free speech. Got it.

Re Kaur vs CPSO (ICRC) judicial review

In a strange legal argument, the Canadian attorney argued that CPSO could curtail the free speech of Dr. Kulvinder Kaur MD because 'the committee said in their decision that they had no interest in curtailing free speech'.

“Deference follows justification, it does not precede it”…. 🎯 🎯 🎯 Lisa Bildy YOU ARE SO SMART I LOVE YOU !

Government decisions didn't need evidence as a basis in Canada, but you'd be punished if you disagreed with their rules...ESPECIALLY if you had expertise and evidence

Again, in Kulvinder Kaur MD ‘s case they misinterpret the Precautionary Principle, which is NOT “there’s an emergency so we must do something!!!”

The PP is the opposite, warning EXACTLY of that human irrational tendency.

The PP says the burden is on those wishing to do the novel…

The Precautionary Principle
youtu.be/iMU7hzcGAiQ

Congratulations to Lisa Bildy for her submission and arguments in defense of Kulvinder Kaur MD . They were by far more rational and cohesive than the counsel for the CPSO. Their lawyer essentially argued physicians can’t publicly promote a position against public health policy, even if…

A really important case for medical ethics. A doctor who put her career on the line for her patients. With the help of Lisa Bildy and Elon Musk this case must be won.

The importance of conscience and the Hippocratic Oath:

First.
Do no harm

“The CPSO issued guidance that doctors’ opinions during Covid-19 had to align with the government, and took steps to censure ethical physicians who raised alarm bells about public health policies,” said Dr. Gill’s lawyer, Lisa Bildy. “But the stifling of scientific debate,…