Phil
@phil_w888
The fundamental human right to make informed health decisions isn't invalidated by others' disapproval of those decisions.
ID:739194785185964033
04-06-2016 20:39:05
81,0K Tweets
5,0K Followers
3,2K Following
UBC Okanagan UBCO School of Nursing Do you think it's ethical to lobby for a total ban on a Health Canada-approved smoking cessation product while cigarettes are still available everywhere?
Do you think it's acceptable to lie to achieve that goal, as Struik did?
It's academic misconduct.
x.com/ubcokanagan/st…
I was looking for research comparing youth vs. adult measures of 'current use' (1+ puffs in P30D vs. some/everyday use).
I found exactly what I was looking for in a 20-year old (!) paper. Thanks Cris Delnevo !
ingentaconnect.com/content/png/aj…
Despite a broad consensus in the scientific community that vaping is vastly safer than cigarettes, most Americans wrongly believe it is just as dangerous. That's a public health catastrophe, getting worse by the day -- largely the fault of FDA Tobacco and the press.
1/🪡
This reddit thread is a brilliant explainer of the flaws of the RCSI study for any of our followers who are worried. I think Dr. Garrett McGovern and Ken Heffernan Photography will agree when we say that this study is misleading!
Read the thread here ! reddit.com/r/ireland/comm…
Christopher Snowdon 🇺🇦 Vaping is only mentioned once re the “swap to stop” scheme. It ignores the impact vaping has had on prev over the last decade and does not attempt to quantify any adverse consequences of banning single-use ecigs, taxing e-liquid and imposing restrictions on packaging and display
Retweeting this reply simply because it was hidden by Cancer Focus Northern Ireland along with other replies.
Now, why would they want no one to see this research commissioned by the UK government?