If the database is indeed with USAID then it contains a carefully guarded secret to the origin of C19. And it ain’t zoonosis.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

What is happening? The Atlantic circulation (Gulf Stream, etc.) appears likely to be close to a tipping point at which it would shut down, a big adverse effect of global warming. An excellent article discusses the evidence, the uncertainties, the effects.
tos.org/oceanography/a…

Wini Ashby Peter Daszak Greg Tucker-Kellogg Anonymous Virologist PhD 🦄 David Quammen There is a video of the bats at WIV. Daszak admitted there are actually bats at WIV and his previous statement was false. But you still don’t believe there were bats at WIV because…Murdoch??

Don't let people take advantage of the language confusion they themselves caused.

Angela Rasmussen nicely explains why she is a 'pundit' rather than a 'scientist':

Alex Washburne And you recall when @peterdaszak at EcoHealth Alliance explicitly lied to you (& me) about that?

Dr. Monica M. Bertagnolli NIH Office of Science Policy @NIH OIG at HHS Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Magdalena Skipper Jocelyn Kaiser ScienceInsider News from Science John Travis Martin Enserink Jon Cohen Science News AAAS National Academies

This revelation of 15,000 samples and 700+ potential bat CoVs shipped to Wuhan thanks to EcoHealth affects the odds

It means there were more different and unpublished SARS-CoVs in that one lab than every other lab in the world. It's very likely SARS-CoV-2 emerged from such a lab…

Rebecca Peter Daszak EcoHealth Alliance Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic OIG at HHS Martin Enserink Rand Paul Retraction Watch Daszak lies even when the facts are in full view and the lies are obvious.

He has no shame, and he has no decency.

Tony Fauci was involved in damage control regarding EcoHealth Alliance 's work in Wuhan:

Read this. Although I'm 99% sure C19 was caused by a lab leak, I'm 100% sure there was a cover up and influence campaign to mask this probability orchestrated by those likely responsible 4 it. The net effect is a broad, massive erosion of societal trust.
blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics…

MJ Allen Jane Orient, MD Actually the lab leakers carefully read all the zoonosi papers and produce strong rebuttals, but the zoonosi never respond back.

It is not two sides both similar but with opposing points of view. It is very clearly one side lying and the other promoting the truth.

CovidOriginFraud_Tenure_Secured Imagine if OJ was appointed lead investigator, refused to allow his home to be searched, and then secretly edited an “independent” report by the LA District Attorney’s office that declared him completely innocent. Even Michael Hiltzik could see the problem there…

I concur with the conclusion.

There is a difference between writing a blog and trully understanding mathematical concepts.

To me, just seeing that Scott Alexander never blinked at the obviously excessive Bayesian factors given to the market location is enough.

Finally, I want to point out this part of the EcoHealth renewal letter for their joint grant with WIV. They basically talk about creating synthetic backbones (reverse genetics systems) out of novel SARS-like strains that are able to evade immunity elicited by SARS1, and then…

In our debate on Covid origins, Peter Peter Miller kept insisting that the DEFUSE proposal was only interested in viruses that are only within a 95% similarity to (i.e. at most 5% different from) SARS1. I thought I fully explained that Peter was mistaken and the judges have agreed…

In some #journalism class in the future, a prof will compare what DRASTIC did to try to uncover Covid origins and compare it with what most mainstream reporters and publications did (next to nothing in terms of real reporting) and draw the appropriate lessons. #media

DKup Peter Miller Dissenting Skeptic Rob Townley Moshiri is an absolute 🤡 who can’t properly code. He’s simply not a credible source of information. Perhaps when almost every other phylogenetic analysis concludes an earlier emergence of SARS2 than Pekar 22, you should consider that Pekar 22 is probably wrong.

Anyone who knew about the 2018 application by EcoHealth Alliance, UNC, WIV and others to DARPA proposing to engineer human optimized furin cleavage sites into SARS coronaviruses but who did not speak up when it became clear such a novel coronavirus was responsible for the #COVID19 …

ecohealthalliance.org/2024/04/ecohea… 'EcoHealth Alliance did not support “gain-of-function” research at WIV.' How does that declaration square with Peter Daszak's glee in 2016?