Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

pronounces judgment on plea challenging Central government circular banning 23 breeds of 'ferocious dogs.'

Circular's effect was earlier stayed in Karnataka.

Justice M Nagaprasanna pronounces order.

Track thread for updates.

#KarnatakaHighCourt pronounces judgment on plea challenging Central government circular banning 23 breeds of 'ferocious dogs.'

Circular's effect was earlier stayed in Karnataka.

Justice M Nagaprasanna pronounces order. 

Track thread for updates.
account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ORDER: Union of India could not have imposed a blanket ban in the teeth of rules in force. Circular travels beyond what is found in ABC Rules (birth control rules).

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If there is a rebirth of such a circular (banning or regulating dog breeds in India), stakeholders shall be heard : Court records in ORDER.

Stakeholders would also include organisation certifying breeds, not just pet owners.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ORDER: In light of this, the circular cannot but be held to contrary be contrary to the law and therefore has to be obliterated.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Court dictates order. Notes that it is admitted that none of the stakeholders were consulted before imposing ban.

Union of India could not have passed a blanket ban without constituting proper committee, hearing stakeholders, court says.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

: Karnataka High Court strikes down recent circular banning 23 breeds of 'ferocious dogs'. Allows writ petition challenging the ban.

Says Centre can issue another circular after proper consultation and by following proper procedure.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In order Court has also noted that Central government has already undertaken before Delhi High Court that it would consult stakeholders.

account_circle
News18(@CNNnews18) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The , while passing the order, stated that should be kept in mind that are responsible if their injure anyone, and they are the ones who have to pay for the expenses

Read: news18.com/india/ktaka-hc…

The #KarnatakaHighCourt, while passing the order, stated that should be kept in mind that #petowners are responsible if their #pets injure anyone, and they are the ones who have to pay for the expenses

Read: news18.com/india/ktaka-hc…
account_circle
LawChakra(@LawChakra) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Seeks Rule Amendment to Allow Chief Justice to Suspend Advocates for Court Boycotts
Read more at : tinyurl.com/2ao6kb6r

tinyurl.com/2ao6kb6r

account_circle
Rishav Dewan(@dewan_rishav) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Not at all happy with this news , the Government must figure out some way of tackling this issue . We have seen in recent times dangerous cases popping up in various societies of Delhi , Gurgaon , Noida etc ..

Not at all happy with this news , the Government must figure out some way of tackling this issue . We have seen in recent times dangerous cases popping up in various societies of Delhi , Gurgaon , Noida etc .. 
#Karnatakahighcourt #dogs #indiatoday #asansol #India
account_circle
Arman(@armanaly) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Great news! The Karnataka High Court has set a precedent by allowing a hearing-impaired advocate, Sarah Sunny, to argue a case through a sign language interpreter. This is a big win for inclusivity in the legal system!

livelaw.in/high-court/kar…

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Court says PETA shall also be heard by UOI.

Court adds: Responsible pet ownership is what is to be considered by UOI, which has to be put in to make pet owners accountable for actions of the dogs they own, ferocious or otherwise.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ORDER: The obliteration will not come in the way of the UOI bringing in amendment ... (in line) with PCA, after following due process of law.

account_circle
Bar and Bench(@barandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

says Central government should consult stakeholders, which is not only pet owners, but relevant organisations.

Court says it should also be kept in mind that pet owners are responsible if their pets injure anyone else, that they should pay for expenses…

account_circle
ಬಾರ್‌ & ಬೆಂಚ್ - Kannada Bar & Bench(@Kbarandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ಮನುಷ್ಯನ ಜೀವಕ್ಕೆ ಎರವಾಗಬಹುದಾದ 23 ಭೀಷಣ ಶ್ವಾನ ತಳಿಗಳ ಸಾಕುವಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ನಿಷೇಧಿಸಿ ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಈಚೆಗೆ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿದ್ದ ಸುತ್ತೋಲೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌.

ಮನುಷ್ಯನ ಜೀವಕ್ಕೆ ಎರವಾಗಬಹುದಾದ 23 ಭೀಷಣ ಶ್ವಾನ ತಳಿಗಳ ಸಾಕುವಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ನಿಷೇಧಿಸಿ ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಈಚೆಗೆ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿದ್ದ ಸುತ್ತೋಲೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌.

#KarnatakaHighCourt #DangerousDogBreeds
account_circle
ಬಾರ್‌ & ಬೆಂಚ್ - Kannada Bar & Bench(@Kbarandbench) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ವಾಕ್‌-ಶ್ರವಣದೋಷವುಳ್ಳ ವಕೀಲೆ ಸಾರಾ ಸನ್ನಿ ವಾದ ಆಲಿಸಿ ಇತಿಹಾಸ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌



kannada.barandbench.com/news/karnataka…

account_circle
vramakanth(@vramakanth_) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The quashes the Centre's . Directs the government to issue another circular after proper consultation and by following proper procedure deccanherald.com/india/karnatak…

account_circle